NEWS RELEASE - Stop Trafficking

 

NEWS RELEASE
Contact Information:  Freedom TV Networks, Inc. (FiTNA)
Contact Name: Melinda Pillsbury-Foster
Phone Number: 805-813-7600

 

PREGNANT MOTHER DRUGGED AND THREATENED BY SOCIAL SERVICES IN NEW YORK

 

Jennifer Nicole Alameda, a presidential candidate running as a Republican, is now being threatened with the loss of her children, the third due to be born in less than one month.  The cited justification for years of separation provided has been the claim she is crazy because she asserted, she was running for President of the United States.

Both the Agency and the Court of New York claimed she could not have been a candidate and that having claimed to be so proved she is insane.

However, Alameda, registered as a candidate with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), provided the Agency with proof of her registration, this being the second time she had registered as a candidate, the first having taken place in 2019.  She actively campaigned and participated in programs for candidates.  A copy of Alameda’s name, listed on the FEC site, was provided for all the candidates who had declared for the Office of President of the United States. 

Debate Tourney, one of our TV Shows, which will be utilizing with our other shows, 2-Way Interaction between TV and enriched Internet, discovered Alameda’s name on the Federal Election Commission site in 2019, sending her a letter offering to include her in the 1 – 1 debate tournament between all presidential candidates who were FEC registered.

This was the second entry into providing candidates with the opportunity to gain public presence.  Our first was Phonevoter TV Network, distributed by Keystone Satellite Communications in 1992. Compared to what is possible now, audience participation was limited, but none the less, this was the reason for the 1992 upset that took out then sitting President George H. W. Bush, and elected Bill Clinton. 

It is generally common knowledge than anyone can run for President of the United States, so we at FiTNA, were surprised at the assertion, which came to us first by Jennifer directly, and then by a representative of the Agency.  Our CEO, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster,  received a call from the Representative and provided the woman with assurance this was the case, this being one of the protocols set for the 2-Way Interactive TV Show series, Debate Tourney, which was first to air in 2022.  Website

The 2020 election disclosed to us that a dog, named Seven, was also a candidate listed by the FEC.

As is our company practice, we cross check with the FEC, and did so both for the 2020 election and for 2024.

 FiTNA is the launching company, a 501©3.  Our first network is Women Leading TV Network. 

For some time now, we have following the gradual failures of the traditional, passive TV Industry, and so began building a partnership for distribution with the leading distribution company, LBISAT.  In this way, we are able to integrate ‘TV’ with the Internet, enabling audiences of millions to participate in our array of shows, which can be viewed at WomenLeading.

    Jennifer Nicole Alameda filed with the Federal Elections Commission in 2020 to run for president of the United States.  We would learn in 2022 this was because she was experiencing hideous problems with the social services system in New York and was seeking a forum to be heard.  Alameda’s statements on this and other issues were articulate and persuasive. 

    Americans are all free to run for the Office of President if they are over 35 and citizens of the United States of America.  During this time, Alameda has been working part time for a group of physicians.  Talking to these physicians forcefully affirmed she was highly competent in her work and valued by her employers. Yet she was being forced to take drugs by the Agency, this affirmed by the New York Court.

    The system, it appears, was preparing to steal her children. Another one of our shows, now in preproduction, focuses on trafficking, so the illegal actions of the Agency and the collusion with the New York Courts set off alarms for us.

     Jennifer was facing multiple problems, but she was a good mother and had done nothing wrong. 

    Jennifer’s story is one or heroic actions in the face of the violence done to her and her children by the Courts and Agencies of New York City. 

For more on Jennifer’s plight, see her page on Debate Tourney.

   The idea of 2-Way Integrated Internet and TV is novel for everyone, but the statistics show this is the coming form for mass communication that Americans demand, accounting for the decline of popularity for passive TV that does not allow people to connect to others and be heard.  This is the reason we are launching FiTNA and the Women Leading Network shows. 

   Jennifer’s older son, now 15, demanded to be allowed to live with his mother.  The Court refused this demand, and the boy fled New York, only to be captured and threatened. 

  Unlike some parents who finally give up, Jennifer has persisted in her efforts to regain custody of her children, who have spent three years away from their mother, who is only allowed to visit with them for 2 hours each week.  The siblings are in separate foster homes and Jennifer was forced to take 2 half-days off work to see each of them separately. 

    We were further shocked to learn that Jennifer has been forced against her will to take Risperdal by the Agency and the Court of New York. Risperdal is according to the Mayo Clinic, “used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or irritability associated with autistic disorder. This medicine should not be used to treat behavioral problems in older adults who have dementia.”  Risperdal is available only by doctor's prescription.

    At each point, Jennifer Alameda has followed the law, but the law, the agencies responsible for the wellbeing of those at risk, and the Courts of New York, appear to have been covertly using families, and children in need as a source for their own enrichment.  

    The taxpayer-funded system for assisting people facing problems was not working to help Jennifer overcome these events, which impacted her and her children.  Instead, it was using the power granted to take her children away from her.

      In 2020, we had no idea just how grave the situation was for Ms. Alameda’s family. 

    Our initial discussions that year were on Ms. Alameda’s focus for women’s issues. A  major element of her campaign was the failure of government and corporately related social services, but we also discussed political subjects which she had researched. This made her stand out as a candidate, since most of the candidates we heard from did not bring up women’s issues at all.  

    Jennifer did not mention her injury until late 2022, and in our conversations gave no reason to think she was having memory issues from a Traumatic Brain Injury received in 2017.

   But we well knew the failures of the government system for social services was flawed and needed attention and change. The lack of appropriate recognition on the issues facing families with lower incomes, along with the challenges of coping with the impact of long-term health problems is very real. 

  After this point, Jennifer shared her personal story with us.  She had already told us, providing photos and the events and groups she had joined for her presidential campaign.  We were stunned at what Jennifer faced, and at her courage, her love for her children, and her persistence.  

Please help us stop what appears to be trafficking carried out by the governmental agencies in New York.  We are now in preproduction for a 2-Way Interactive show,  https://stoptraffickingusa.com/  

Americans must see and understand the dangers we face today.  This is the goal for Women Leading. 

Review - Divinity of Doubt - The God Question

 

Saturday, November 10, 2012

August 1, 2011 - brilliant! BRILLIANT! THANKS The Divinity of Doubt - Review by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

email to me from Ilene Proctor

Ilene Proctor proctor@xxx.net	8/1/11
to me, gailbug1234

From: Melinda Pillsbury-Foster [mailto:themelinda@xxx.com]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 10:37 AM
To: Ilene Proctor; Leon Smith; novakeo. com
Subject: The Divinity of Doubt - Review by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

 

Sometimes a book carries impact beyond what the author intended. The Divinity of Doubt by Vincent Bugliosi is such a book. Overtly the book frames the acrimonious conflict between Evangelical Christianity as a set of unproven beliefs, each vulnerable to the bald facts of reality, and the parallel set of unproven beliefs comprising the ideas accepted by atheists.

Bugliosi applies a single standard, the same one which has proven so devastating to carefully constructed theories over the past generation in his series of best sellers from Helter Skelter, the book which removed doubt on the Tate Murders to The Prosecution of George Bush for Murder, the book which provides the evidence to convict a president of the United States of murder for profit.

As you read your way through Bugliosi's past work you sense an increasing focus of attention as his contextual frame enlarges in scope to subsume a deeper analysis of the intellectual and belief habits of humanity, this being the frames which limit and divide us over ideas, accepted without proof. This, Bugliosi maintains, is equally true for Christians and atheists. During the course of our interview Bugliosi made the observation that atheists found his book more disturbing than did Christians. This stems, Bugliosi notes, from the fact atheists had failed to examine their own rejection of God from the rules of evidence, attacking theology in place of God without understanding the difference while Christians more often rely on faith alone.

Over the course of his examination Bugliosi takes each set of beliefs, Christian and atheist, scrutinizing each, on the evidence, finding each riddled with contradiction and unproven assertions. Both Christianity and atheism are 'faith-based,' he asserts, using the Bible and other Christian authoritative works and the written works of proponents of atheism for this purpose. 

Working through the theology of Christianity Bugliosi questions and disproves each of the bulwarks of traditional Christianity in an exhaustive examination of the Bible, including the virginity of Mary, the mother of Jesus. He then examines the work of Richard Dawkins, again exhaustively examining the attacks made on Christianity to point out no proof is provided God does not exist. The intellectual ammunition of atheism is spent on the target of theology, unproven beliefs which are entirely human in origin. 

Arriving at the position of agnosticism Bugliosi cites the impact of the book on many Christians, including Frank Shaffer one of the founders of the religious right in America. Bugliosi gave Shaffer a copy of the book who reported, “I found myself following my wife around the house reading sections to her.”

Shaffer, according to Bugliosi, is no longer a fundamentalist Christian.

The book, using rules of evidence to remove two human frames for seeing the world beyond what humanity can know, points to the larger questions which each belief system attempts to contain. In this, what is revealed is the need for security common to both Christianity and Atheism and the questions which haunt the mind during long nights of solitary thought. 

The human need for emotional security, created through structures of ideas logically disconnected from the facts, becomes the elephant-in-the-room question which Divinity of Doubt hands us along with the challenge to understand unconsidered elements of human history, behavior, and biology. Like Moses standing at the border of the Promised Land, Bugliosi's book beckons us to enter.

Did humanity, moving from the unquestioning world of nature to the human world of thought and ideas, invent religion to fill a need which otherwise could not be met? That primitive people devise explanations of the world outside their understanding which we characterize as 'myths,' is well known. Myths provide framing, explaining through stories and the action of iconic figures what evades human understanding. 

Myths reflect the persistent human need to see beyond the darkness and today humanity is still seeking to grasp things beyond reason, logic, and the present grasp of science. At a time when new fields of human inquiry are opening, like flowers blooming in the springtime, the reframing of ideas continues to accelerate, shedding new light and changing the landscape of human thought. And no end is in view.

In a world resting on uncertainties security comes in many forms and the myths which work are those which will endure.

When you close the cover of Divinity of Doubt you are left with a deeper understanding of the foibles and struggles of humanity. You also come away and with tools which serve you to step on to the path of self-discovery as you accept the uncertainty of a world no human mind can encompass.

 

 

A $97-Trillion Exchange of ideas

 

by Brock d'Avignon

Ms. Koch,

If you want a seeming exclusive no other reporters seem smart or wise enough to see as all politicians say they do not want to touch Social Security, they've actually been raiding its SSA "Trust Fund" for most of 83 years replacing it with IOUs (fancier term in the Congressional Budget Office that ignores the time value of money at $97-Trillion)  that are spent in either the General Fund or for specific agencies. Try this: None of the agencies nor Congress has ever repaid the "Trust Fund". Outfits like the PeterG. Petersen Foundation whine about the operational budget debt annually going over $30T to $34T but seem to miss the IOUs in the SSA Trust Fund, and the similar time value of money lost to spending sprees since LBJ since 1965 raiding the Medicare Trust Fund to about $80T. The principal amounts having never been repaid have either interest due or the equivalent of interest due. The Ponzi scheme set up by FDR and LBJ are neither insurance nor a contribution as in the phrase Federal Insurance Contribution Act FICA. I've told the Petersen Foundation to get real but their Executive director JRosen@pgpf.org keeps ignoring this, even as they do a nice job of the debt clock. If you'd like information on the 27 federal Government Special Entities (tax-payer supported banks) that now own 92% of the mortgages in America since 2008, let me know.

You might contact Jim Mietus, Executive Branch Office of Management and Budget retired (Reagan to Obama) 703-759-3007, Tell him I sent you for advice. One suggestion is freeze, lower, or eliminate various federal departments or agencies' budgets, with the requirement that 10% per year of it will be returned to the SSA fund. No more talk of cutting down the seniors, but the bureaucracy that had a wild time with retirement funds and medical funds. Indict every Congress person who ever voted for spending SSA or Medicare Trust Funds on anything else as racketeers. (Probably 2/3rds of them of all parties). Try Institute of Justice or pacific Legal Foundation for that should make more headlines than the nonsense. Or you might discuss the cracking of the supergene on ageing or something intelligent. Jeff Bezos dropped $3B on cracking 1600 genomic diseases including ageing, so that might factor into future calculations to not rip off the elders until they get their booster spice and rejoin the workforce. All arguments are irrelevant to money retained and or invested for the purpose intended, the rest is a smokescreen. 

If you want a contrast to this fraud, see the French who do not let their politicians touch one centime of their mandated (forced) retirement or medical savings or accounts. France invests it all in the French stock and bond markets. As a result, the French senior and disabled are the most solvent in the world while Americans are the most broke. The French have about 11 different kinds of pensions based on the occupation from chef to railroad engine driver. Check it out, its on Wikipedia. Americans would say to you," Don't be stupid." the French would say, "Be wiser."

$97-Trillion

A Short Commentary on the Election for President, 2024

 

Donald Trump won the presidency. This is a fact, and the event shocked the group who all too often identify themselves as “Liberals.” 

Biden and Harris were never liberals, the meaning of that word having been in long and consistent usage for centuries, as you see below. But by nature, and ideology, never opposed to theft, they have shamelessly misused the word, once the battle-cry for individual freedom.

From the Wiki – “Liberalism, the belief in freedom, equality, democracy and human rights, is historically associated with thinkers such as John Locke and Montesquieu, and with constitutionally limiting the power of the monarch, affirming parliamentary supremacy, passing the Bill of Rights and establishing the principle of "consent of the governed". The 1776 Declaration of Independence of the United States founded the nascent republic on liberal principles without the encumbrance of hereditary aristocracy—the declaration stated that "all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness".[1] A few years later, the French Revolution overthrew the hereditary aristocracy, with the slogan "liberty, equality, fraternity" and was the first state in history to grant universal male suffrage. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, first codified in 1789 in France, is a foundational document of both liberalism and human rights, itself based on the U.S. Declaration of Independence written in 1776. The intellectual progress of the Enlightenment, which questioned old traditions about societies and governments, eventually coalesced into powerful revolutionary movements that toppled what the French called the Ancien Régime, the belief in absolute monarchy and established religion, especially in Europe, Latin America and North America.
William Henry of Orange in theGlorious Revolution, Thomas Jefferson in the American Revolution and Lafayette in the French Revolution used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of what they saw as tyrannical rule. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe, South America, and North America.[2] In this period, the dominant ideological opponent of classical liberalism was conservatism, but liberalism later survived major ideological challenges from new opponents, such as fascism and communism. Liberal government often adopted the economic beliefs espoused by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and others, which broadly emphasized the importance of free markets and laissez-faire governance, with a minimum of interference in trade.”

The practiced rebranders of words, for the moment defeated, by Trump, closer to real "Liberalism", today expressed as Conservative, Libertarian, or Free Market, will be leaving office in January 2025. I personally hope they take their Fascism and Communism with them. But it is likely there will be more confrontations. I listened to her concession and the twisting of reality was clearly expressed, though she used the freedom terms shamelessly, as usual.

The three terms in the paragraph above, Liberalism, Conservative, and Libertarian, are the bedrock of thought that resulted in the rejection of top-down dictatorships, such as we experienced with Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union during WWII and later.

Operating on the well-proven theory that a lie can be converted to ‘truth’ if you say it often enough and loudly enough, the departing cadre of Not-Liberals, Biden and Harris, were practiced experts for asserting that lie. This assault on our individual rights began in 1912 and included the grab of the Hetch Hetchy by San Francisco. America has been rapidly descending into fascism/communism during the Biden Administration, this beginning in 1912. For this election round, Americans of all ages and other descriptions noticed this through the inflation and tightening bondage that they were experiencing and voted for Donald Trump.

Also note that Union Blue, the color for more than a century always associated with the Republican Party. Red is historically the color associated with the 'Democratic Party'. These colors became identified with the two political parties during the Civil War, when the North fought to end slavery, and the South fought to continue it.  This switch was carried out, I believe by CNN about 20 years ago. 

The Magical Equation for Needy Spouses in Santa Barbara County

 The answer will be up here on September 11, 2024 because the two stories have some curious linkages.  

How About Some Forbidden History today?

 Facebook did not like what I had to say, claimed what is below is spam, and deleted this cute little article.  I disagree.  A Pox on Zuckerman, or berg, or whatever his name is.  MP-F

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

This morning, I visited this cheesy website, hosted at winred.com, and realized this is just a con job for building up their email list.  You are donating to the campaign of Mike Rogers, not his smiling companion Donald Trump, the GOP Candidate for President.  

(Don’t even mention the outrage of having the Republican Party’s Official Color changed from Union Blue, in commemoration of the Civil War battle for ending slavery, to RED, the Official Color for the Confederacy, which had adopted the Socialist paradigm promoted by George Fitzhugh in his book, Sociology for the South, or, the Failure of Free Society (1854).     

Did Mike Roger produce this idea, or did he remember a similar, but very different, idea presented on DebateTourney.com? 

Three  years ago, we  provided a page for each candidate for President who registered with us to debate other candidates, now routinely ignored by the MSM, not only real debates on real issues, but a full page showing the faces and qualifications for every member of their Cabinet if that Presidential Candidate were to be elected.  This was to be viewed as a promise, not a come-on.

All of us need to tie candidates down, guaranteeing their performance in office.  I realized this in 1992 while looking at an old pot holder and suggested a different solution, Honesty Bond as a way to hold those running for office to their campaign promises.  Naturally, it would work, so it was ignored.  I had originally floated the idea to Republicans, because at the time I had left the LP, from frustration with the approach of LP presidential candidates who insisted on focusing on raising small amounts of money from loyalists and never challenging the media and the anointed MSM candidates. 

If the idea, faintly, reminds you of the idea Newt Gingrich floated for Contract ON America, you are correct.  I was surprised to learn one of the pieces of literature on Honesty Bond, I passed out at the California Convention that year was handed to Gingrich by John Fund, who was then in a relationship with my daughter, Morgan Pillsbury.  It was Morgan who revealed this to me when she asked some years later, “What was that idea you had, remember? The one about the pot holder?” 

It was educational, and I left with not a moment of regret, as much was revealed to me.    

The number of people running for the Presidency today is not two or three, but about 1,400, duly registered with the FEC.

My thought was that for generations now we have been forced to buy a pig in a poke, as we decide who to support for the Office of President of the United States. 

Firm commitments on who will be entrusted with the growing number of ways government now rules over us could provide a real sense of confidence in a presidential candidate who is asking for our vote.  But it would have to be a real pledge from the candidate for president. Obviously, in this instance, Donald is not promising anything.

Now, if a presidential candidate nominated a highly qualified free market economist, such as Walter Block, for Secretary of the Treasury, which would mean something. 

Right now, our only registered candidate is Jennifer Nicole Alameda, who would certainly be happy to let you know the make up of her cabinet, if asked. 

Get in touch, folks for freedom need to listen to each other and then enact the principles!

oun

1. A basic truth, law, or assumption.
   "the principles of democracy."
2. Actually, for me it is agency, spelled large.  

Auschwitz 2.0: The Zionists' despicable "Summer of Cruelty" in Gaza

 By Jane Stillwater  https://jpstillwater.blogspot.com/2024/08/auschwitz-20-zionists-despicable-summer.html

     My Aunt Doris from Detroit married a survivor of Auschwitz.  Could anything be worse than a Nazi concentration camp as grim as Auschwitz?  Apparently so.  Zionists are currently competing for the title of having created the Worst Concentration Camp Ever -- almost like it was some kind of Olympic event and they were striving for a gold metal in bestiality, trying to beat Auschwitz' previous record of being the most cruel place on earth.

     By Jane Stillwater  https://jpstillwater.blogspot.com/2024/08/auschwitz-20-zionists-despicable-summer.html

     My Aunt Doris from Detroit married a survivor of Auschwitz.  Could anything be worse than a Nazi concentration camp as grim as Auschwitz?  Apparently so.  Zionists are currently competing for the title of having created the Worst Concentration Camp Ever -- almost like it was some kind of Olympic event and they were striving for a gold metal in bestiality, trying to beat Auschwitz' previous record of being the most cruel place on earth.

    Here's even more history of the 100-year ongoing massacre of Palestinians by Zionists:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjGFH1Le3gA 

 

For those of you who still read stuff, Paul Larudee pleads with the Zionists to give America back our country:  https://paullarudee.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-israel-i-want-my-country

 

And we are being duped about Venezuela's elections too -- because gold and oil are involved (of course):  https://www.youtube.com/live/_x1JN-uuxww

America, just wait until "your boy comes home in a box" after defending the Zionists' right to commit genocide:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ws0DLWApHko