From: EcoNews
by Laura Beans
Yesterday,
the inspector general concluded that the U.S. State Department did not
violate conflict-of-interest rules with the selection of Environmental
Resources Management (ERM) to conduct environmental assessments of the
proposed Keystone XL pipeline project, according to the L.A. Times.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told the L.A. Times that
the inspector general “found that our processes not only avoided
conflicts of interest, but were more rigorous than required.”
The inspector general’s findings are a blow to environmental groups and concerned citizen that have been working to stop the Keystone XL project. |
The report came as blow to environmental groups and concerned
citizens opposed to the controversial pipeline project. In October, as reported by EcoWatch,
groups had urged Inspector General Steve Linick to conduct an
investigation into the business ties between TransCanada—the company
building the pipeline—and ERM.
The State Department released their Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in January, determining that the pipeline would not increase the rate of extraction of tar sands and thus isn’t likely to significantly increase carbon emissions and climate change. Last
June President Obama vowed he would only approve the Keystone XL
pipeline if it “does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon
pollution.”
No comments:
Post a Comment