From: TIME - Science & Space
Authorities have virtually no way of regulating many industrial chemicals. The latest spill could change that.
MORE
Authorities have virtually no way of regulating many industrial chemicals. The latest spill could change that.
There was no shortage of confusion when news broke in West Virginia
on Jan. 9 about a chemical spill that contaminated water for 300,000
people around the state’s capital. Freedom Industries, the company that
owned the tank that ruptured, spilling chemicals into the Elk River,
didn’t know how the leak occurred or when it happened. It wasn’t clear
who discovered the leak—Freedom Industries employees or Environmental
Protection Agency inspectors—and it wasn’t clear how much of the
chemical had spilled into the river, with initial estimates of 5,000
gallons eventually rising to 7,500 gallons. It wasn’t clear how long
West Virginians would be without water after Governor Earl Ray Tomblin
ordered a ban on drinking, bathing or cooking with tap water in the
capital of Charleston and nine surrounding counties.
But most of all, it wasn’t clear how dangerous the chemical,
4-methylcyclohexane methanol (MCHM), was to human health—mostly because
no one knew anything about its health effects, including the company
that was storing it, government regulators and even academics who study
chemical safety. MCHM is one of 64,000 chemicals that were grandfathered
in when the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)—the federal law
regulating chemical safety—was passed in 1976. According to Richard
Denison, a senior scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF),
there are no human health studies available for MCHM, just a couple of
Material Data Safety Sheets (MSDS) from the chemical’s producer, one of
which references a study done on the toxic effects of the chemical on
rats. But even that study isn’t publicly available—it’s considered
proprietary by the Eastman Chemical Company, the maker of MCHM.
Otherwise, this is what is publicly known about the human health effects of the chemical:
MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment