From: EcoWatch
Oil Change International
As the Obama Administration continues to ponder a decision on the Keystone XL
pipeline, TransCanada has been assuring everyone of it’s safety.
“Safety of the public and the environment is a top priority for
TransCanada” their slick website reads. Any spill is deemed “unlikely.”
Hardly. Last year, there were 364 spills from pipelines that released about 54,000 barrels of oil and refined products. In 2010 in Marshall, Michigan an Enbridge pipeline sent 819,000 gallons of toxic tar sands crude into the town’s creek just 80 river miles from Lake Michigan. Now in Mayflower, Ark., 22 homes have been evacuated this week as Exxon prepares to attempt to clean 10,000 barrels of this same dirty tar sands crude from neighborhoods.
The experiences of people of Marshall, Michigan may shed light on what the citizens of Mayflower, Arkansas may now be in for.
On July 26, 2010, at 7:30 a.m., Marshall resident Susan
Connolly dropped off her children at daycare. That Michigan morning
there was a strong smell in the air, making it hard to breathe. By the
time she picked up her children just a few hours later, the symptoms had
started.
That night her son vomited. The week following, her
daughter had a rash, as did almost all the children at the daycare. The
other children also reported cases of vomiting, upset stomach, shortness
of breath, lethargy, headaches, rash, irritation with the eyes, sore
throat and cough. Meanwhile, Connolly and her husband experienced
migraines, eye irritation, sore throat, nausea and cough. Just six days
later, their dog came in from the yard suffering from continuous
vomiting and diarrhea.
They quickly learned that this was all related to a broken
Enbridge pipe, spilling bitumen ooze into the water just 6/10ths of a
mile from their children’s day care and just two miles from their home.
Bitumen is a thick, sticky, black semi-solid form of petroleum. It is transported from Alberta Canada as diluted bitumen (dilbit) on its way to refineries in the U.S.
“I’m a parent and I see the children and the staff of this
center who have been affected by this spill,” says Connolly. “Three
months after the spill, four parents withdrew six children from the
center due to their concern of their short-term health effects of their
children. They were concerned about the smell, air quality, and
potential long-term effects. An employee who has been with the child
care center since it opened, who helped them build it from the ground
up, left the center because she has been sick since the day of the
spill.”
Their concern is understandable. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency established that there were 15 parts per billion of
benzene in the atmosphere in the region of the spill, which is roughly
three times the standard established as safe for human exposure.
Connolly reports that “the argument made by Enbridge is:
you cannot prove that the spill may be the cause. Well, my response as a
parent is you can’t prove that it’s not … I’m not anti-pipeline, but I
am an advocate for safety. You need to know the health impacts. There
will be another spill, it’s not an if, it’s a when.”
Connolly’s story highlights the clear effects of the
revolving door of money from politicians and fossil fuel companies
keeping the safety standards and oversight low. In 2009 and 2010 fossil
fuel companies like Enbridge spent $25.8 million lobbying Congress and in return they received subsidies and tax loopholes worth $20.5 billion. That’s a 5,800 percent return on political investment; about $59 in return for each dollar they spend lobbying.
Connolly sees the influence fossil fuel companies have on
Washington, DC, firsthand. She asks, “Who do you think [government
officials] are looking out for more? Corporations or the people?”
Companies that transport oil are required to pay into the
Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, giving the government a pot of money for
immediate spill responses. The Enbridge pipeline in Michigan and the
Exxon pipeline in Arkansas, however, are exempt because these pipelines
are not considered to be carrying “conventional oil,” despite the fact
bitumen spills are more expensive and more dangerous. MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment