From: Common Dreams
Protesters face violence, arrest and serious charges. Only the brave dare face this savage suppression
by Laurie Penny
First
they came for the students. This week, 12 vanloads of police arrived at
Sussex University, in collaboration with management, to evict students who
had been occupying a room on campus for eight weeks. They had been
taking a stand against privatisation of services at their university,
creating a militant "pop-up union" and attracting support from all over
the country: they had to be got rid of. Photographs from the day show
police in antiseptic yellow uniforms swarming in as if to disinfect a
wound in the body politic where the rage was bleeding through.
The
suppression of student protest by the British state has been savage and
efficient over the past three years. The students of Sussex were brave
even to make the attempt. They knew all too well that they were risking
arrest, serious criminal charges and physical violence from police and
hired security, and that is what happened. It's what always happens when
a government uses force to suppress radicalism.
Right
now, as millions of people stare down the barrel of job losses,
benefits sanctions, destitution and desperation and the rich are given
tax cuts, I hear a lot of people asking why there isn't more resistance
going on. Well, here's why. There was resistance, and it was brutally
and systematically put down. The students, the street-organising
anti-cuts campaigners, the Occupy movement. When people speak about the Occupy camps and
anti-austerity protests of 2010-12, it is with a tone of regret, as if
somehow those grassroots movements just fizzled out because those
involved didn't know what they were doing. On the contrary: they were
cleared out, arrested and beaten back by police, just like the students
at Sussex.
In
Tory Britain, as the cuts kick in, even the most peaceful protests are
put down as a warning to the rest of us. Last November, Bethan
Tichborne, a 28-year-old teaching assistant, appeared at a public event
in Oxfordshire and calmly told David Cameron that he had "blood on his
hands". She was referring to the prime minister's decision to take away
vital social support from people with disabilities, a policy that has
already cost lives.
Tichborne
was grabbed, tackled to the ground and restrained during her arrest, as
Cameron continued to speak: "The police officers on top of me either
couldn't or wouldn't hear me," she wrote on her blog. "I was crying and
bleeding, I couldn't properly breathe.". Two weeks ago she was convicted of
causing "harassment, alarm and distress" and fined more than a month's
wages. The message is clear: whether or not a protest is peaceful and
legal is entirely up to the police and judiciary to decide, so if you
want to play it safe, stay at home and sign a petition.
Last month, two of the students involved in the Parliament Square protests of December 2010, Alfie Meadows and Zak King,
were acquitted of violent disorder. This is a charge used almost
exclusively against political protesters that carries a sentence of five
years in prison. Meadows, King and their friends spent two years
fighting to overturn the charges, prevented from speaking out by the
courts process.
It
seems a curious coincidence that the police singled out Meadows for
scapegoating as a violent extremist, given that on the protest in
question, as the police attacked students in Parliament Square, he
received a blow to the head that required emergency brain surgery. He
still has a hand-length scar across his skull. Even now, I am obliged to
say that it's not been proved in court that Meadows' near-fatal brain
bleed was caused by a police baton, because if I don't I might get the
Guardian sued.
Sadly,
many of the liberal-minded folk now wondering aloud where all the anger
on the streets has gone were the same people who condemned the students
and anti-cuts protesters for being just a bit too noisy, too rowdy, too
"violent". As soon as the frustrated kids of Britain and their allies
started smashing up bus stops and lighting bonfires outside Tory HQ,
that was too much: throw the selfish brats in prison, teach them to mind
their manners. First they came for the students. Now they've come for
the rest of us, who will speak out?
Any
government trying to push through austerity against the will of a large
proportion of the population is going to have to rely on force to deal
with dissent. That's exactly what this government, which had the support
of just one in seven of the population even before it started tearing
up the welfare state, has done. New movements to resist austerity must
expect to meet the same wall of state violence as soon as they become
effective, because that's how the Tories operate. It's how they've
always operated. And shame on us, even in these cowardly times, if we
don't support those with the courage to take a stand.
Laurie
Penny is a journalist, author, feminist, reprobate. Lives in a little
hovel room somewhere in London, mainly eating toast and trying to set
the world to rights. Drinks too much tea. Has still not managed to quit
smoking.
No comments:
Post a Comment