From: Ronald
M.
Powell,
Ph.D.
People
from
coast
to
coast
in
the
USA,
and
from
one
side
of
the
world
to
the
other,
are
becoming
ill
after
exposure
to
the
radiofrequency
radiation
emitted
by
Wireless
Smart
Meters.
Attached
are
the
results
of
two
surveys
of
the
symptoms
being
reported.
The
first
survey
comes
from
the
United
States
and
includes
318
adults,
from
28 states
from
California
to New York,
and
addresses
wireless
utility
meters
that
are
principally
Wireless Smart
Meters.
The
second
survey
comes
from
the
other
side
of the
world,
Victoria,
Australia,
and
includes
92
adults
and
children,
and
addresses
Wireless
Smart
Meters
exclusively.
Altogether,
410
adults
and
children
are
included.
Both
surveys report
new or
worsened
symptoms
after the
installation
of
wireless
utility
meters
in a
given
individual’s
environment.
The
attached
two graphs
show
the
percentage
of individuals
in each
survey
who
experienced
each
symptom.
The
two
surveys
group
the
symptoms
into
somewhat
different
clusters,
but these
clusters
are similar
enough
to enable
comparison
between
the
surveys.
Of
the
top seven
clusters
of symptoms
in
both
surveys,
six
clusters
are
similar
in both
description
and
order
of occurrence:
(1)
sleep
disruption;
(2)
headaches;
(3)
ringing
or buzzing
in the
ears;
(4)
fatigue;
(5)
loss
of
concentration,
memory,
and
learning
ability;
and
(6)
disorientation,
dizziness,
and
loss
of
balance.
Most
individuals
in
the
surveys
developed
multiple
symptoms.
The
surveys do
not
tell
us how
likely a
given
individual
is to become
symptomatic
after exposure
to the
radiation
from
Wireless
Smart
Meters.
But
the
surveys do
tell
us
which
symptoms
a
person
who does
become
symptomatic
is most
likely
to experience.
The
many
symptoms
found
reflect
the
many
body
systems
that
are disrupted
by
such
radiation.
A symptom,
of course,
is something
that
can
be
sensed
by
an individual,
and
thus
can
serve as a
warning.
Unfortunately,
many
health
effects
caused
by
radiofrequency
radiation
have
no early
symptoms
and
thus
give no
warning.
These
health
effects
become
evident
only
after
significant
harm
has
been
done.
Examples
are DNA
damage,
cancer,
and
reproduction
effects.
1
Ronald
M.
Powell
is
a retired
career
U.S.
Government
scientist.
He
holds
a Ph.D.
in
Applied
Physics
from
Harvard
University.
During
his
Government
career,
he
worked
for
the
Executive
Office
of
the
President,
the
National
Science
Foundation,
and
the
National
Institute
of
Standards
and
Technology.
New
or
Worsened
Symptoms
Reported
by
318
Individuals
after
Exposure
to
Wireless
Utility
Meters
in
the
USA1
Sleep
problems 49%
Ringing
in
the
ears 38%
Arthritis,
body
pain,
sharp,
stabbing
pains 18%
Urinary
problems
9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
1
Ed
Halteman,
Ph.D.,
statistics,
Final
Results
Summary:
Wireless
Utility
Meter
Safety
Impacts
Survey,
September
13,
2011,
p.
22
(http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Wireless-Utility-Meter-Safety-Impacts-Survey-Results-Final.pdf).
97
percent
of
respondents
to
full
survey
were
in
the
USA,
from
28
states
with
most
in
California
(78
percent)
and
New
York
(16
percent).
OBJECTIVES
Executive
Summary
by
Ed
Halteman,
Ph.D.
Wireless
Utility
Meter
Safety
Impacts
To
investigate
reported
public
health
and
safety
complaints
about
wireless
utility
meters.
To
evaluate
the
impacts
on
health
and
safety
due
to
wireless
utility
meters.
To
determine
whether
further
study
is
warranted.
METHODS
Survey
was
designed
by
the
EMF
Safety
Network
(Network).
The
survey
was
circulated
online
through
various
social
media
outlets
including
Network’s
email
list,
Facebook,
and
the
California
EMF
Safety
Coalition
(a
discussion
group).
The
survey
was
also
posted
on
Network’s
website:
www.emfsafetynetwork.org
where
visitors
were
invited
to
take
the
survey.
443
responses
were
received
from
7/13/2011
through
9/2/2011.
(318
of
the
443
answered
the
health
questions
that
formed
the
basis
for
the
bar
chart
on
symptoms.
RMPowell)
Network
commissioned
Survey
Design
and
Analysis
(SDA)
to
provide
this
report
of
the
survey
findings.
RESPONDENT
MAKEUP
93%
are
over
40 years
old
and
43%
are
over
60
years
old.
73%
are
women.
78%
are
from
California.
68%
have
Pacific
Gas
and
Electric
(PG&E) as
their
utility
provider.
49%
are
EMF
Sensitive.
41%
have
had
a
new
wireless
meter
installed
in their
home;
of
these
. .
.
o
56%
have
had
it installed
for
at
least
six months
o
89%
have
electric
meters,
53%
gas
meters
and
10%
water
meters
o
35%
saw
an
increase
in
their
utility
bill
o
26%
have
experienced
some
type
of
interference
o
8%
experienced
burned
out
appliances
or
damaged
electronics
including
TV,
stereo,
computer,
refrigerator
and
other.
76%
indicated
they
have
wireless
utility
meters
installed
in
their
neighborhood,
town
or city.
o
44%
near
their
home
o
36%
in
town
TOP
HEALTH
ISSUES
SINCE
NEW
METERS
INSTALLED
Sleep
problems
(mentioned
by
49%)
Stress,
anxiety
and
irritability
(43%)
Headaches
(40%)
(Intentionally
listed
at
41%
on
symptoms
bar
graph,
rounded
up
from
40.9%.
RMPowell)
Ringing
in the
ears
(38%)
Heart
problems
(26%)
UTILITY
and
PUBLIC
UTILITY
COMMISSION
INTERACTIONS
(Title
inserted
by
RMPowell.)
40%
(111
people)
of those
having
wireless
meters
in their
homes
or community
have
complained
to
their
utility
provider.
o
96%
of these
people
were
either
“Unsatisfied”
or
“Very
Unsatisfied”
with
the
handling
of
their
complaint.
32%
(88
people)
complained
to
the
utilities
commission.
o
96%
of these
people
were
either
“Unsatisfied”
or
“Very
Unsatisfied”
with
the
handling
of their
complaint
94%
of
respondents
want
to
retain
or
restore
their
analog
meters
and
92%
of
these
respondents
do
not
think
they
should
have
to
pay
any
additional
money.
STATISTICAL
TESTING
SHOWS
THE
TOP
HEALTH
SYMPTOMS
ARE
POSITIVELY
ASSOCIATED
WITH
EMF
Sensitivity
Wireless
meters
installed
in the
home
New
or
Worsened
Symptoms
Reported
by
92
Individuals
after
Exposure
to
Wireless
Smart
Meters
in
Australia1
1
Federica
Lamech,
MBBS,
Self-Reporting
of
Symptom
Development
from
Exposure
to
Radiofrequency
Fields
of
Wireless
Smart
Meters
in Victoria,
Australia:
A
Case
Series.
Alternative
Therapies,
Nov/Dec
2014,
Vol.
20,
No.
6,
pages
28-38.
NIH
PMID
25478801
(http://www.alternative-therapies.com
and
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478801).
Abstract
of Dr.
Federica
Lamech’s
Article
from
the
National
Institutes
of
Health
PubMed
Index
Altern
Ther
Health
Med.
2014
Nov-Dec;20(6):28-39.
Self-reporting
of
symptom
development
from
exposure
to
radiofrequency
fields
of
wireless
smart
meters
in Victoria,
Australia:
a
case
series.
Lamech
F. Abstract
CONTEXT:
In
2006,
the
government
in the
state
of
Victoria,
Australia,
mandated
the
rollout
of
smart
meters
in
Victoria,
which
effectively
removed
a
whole
population's
ability
to
avoid
exposure
to
human-made
high-frequency
nonionizing
radiation.
This
issue appears
to
constitute
an
unprecedented
public
health
challenge
for
Victoria.
By August
2013,
142
people
had
reported
adverse
health
effects
from
wireless
smart
meters
by
submitting
information
on
an
Australian
public
Web site
using
its
health
and
legal
registers.
OBJECTIVE:
The
study
evaluated
the
information
in
the
registers
to
determine
the
types
of symptoms
that
Victorian
residents
were
developing
from
exposure
to
wireless
smart
meters.
DESIGN:
In
this
case
series,
the
registers'
managers
eliminated
those
cases
that
did
not
clearly
identify
the
people
providing
information
by
name,
surname,
postal
address,
and/or
e-mail
to
make
sure
that
they
were
genuine
registrants.
Then
they
obtained
consent
from
participants
to
have
their
deidentified
data
used
to
compile
the
data
for
the
case
series.
The
author
later
removed
any
individual
from
outside
of
Victoria.
PARTICIPANTS:
The
study
included
92
residents
of
Victoria,
Australia.
OUTCOME
MEASURES:
The
author
used
her
medical
experience
and
judgment
to
group
symptoms
into
clinically
relevant
clusters
(eg,
pain
in
the
head
was
grouped
with
headache,
tinnitus
was
grouped
with
ringing
in
the
ears).
The
author
stayed
quite
close
to
the
wording
used
in the
original
entries.
She
then
calculated
total
numbers
and
percentages
for
each
symptom
cluster.
Percentages
were
rounded
to
the
nearest
whole
number.
RESULTS:
The
most
frequently
reported
symptoms
from
exposure
to
smart
meters
were
(1)
insomnia,
(2)
headaches,
(3)
tinnitus,
(4)
fatigue,
(5)
cognitive
disturbances,
(6)
dysesthesias
(abnormal
sensation),
and
(7)
dizziness.
The
effects
of
these
symptoms
on
people's
lives
were
significant.
CONCLUSIONS:
Review
of
some
key
studies,
both
recent
and
old
(1971),
reveals
that
the
participants'
symptoms
were
the
same as
those
reported
by
people
exposed
to
radiofrequency
fields
emitted
by
devices
other
than
smart
meters.
Interestingly,
the
vast
majority
of
Victorian
cases
did
not
state
that
they
had
been
sufferers
of
electromagnetic
hypersensitivity
syndrome
(EHS)
prior
to
exposure
to
the
wireless
meters,
which
points
to
the
possibility
that
smart meters
may
have
unique
characteristics
that
lower
people's
threshold
for
symptom
development.
PMID:
25478801
No comments:
Post a Comment