From: PolitiFacts
The Truth-O-Meter Says:
"EPA officials have commended (Koch Industries) for our ‘commitment to a cleaner environment’ and called us ‘a model for other companies.’ "
Charles Koch on Wednesday, April 2nd, 2014 in an op-ed for the "Wall Street Journal."
For several weeks now, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has
taken to the chamber floor to malign David and Charles Koch, the
billionaire brothers who contribute heavily to libertarian causes and
bankroll ads critical of Democrats.
On April 2, 2014, Charles Koch fired back in a Wall Street Journal op-ed,
arguing that Reid’s comments were disrespectful and a bad sign for
democracy. And he defended Koch Industries and their subsidiaries
against attacks, including claims that they oppose environmental
protections.
"Koch employees have earned well over 700 awards for environmental,
health and safety excellence since 2009, many of them from the
Environmental Protection Agency and Occupational Safety and Health
Administration," Koch wrote. "EPA officials have commended us for our
‘commitment to a cleaner environment’ and called us ‘a model for other
companies.’ " MORE
Bottom Line
Our ruling
In his op-ed, Charles Koch wrote that "EPA officials have commended us for our ‘commitment to a cleaner environment’ and called us ‘a model for other companies.’ " Actually, the EPA was focusing on very limited aspects of Koch Industries and not the company as a whole. Further, Koch Industries has a history with the EPA that was completely glossed over, and it includes multiple violations of rules.
The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it Mostly False.
Bottom Line
Our ruling
In his op-ed, Charles Koch wrote that "EPA officials have commended us for our ‘commitment to a cleaner environment’ and called us ‘a model for other companies.’ " Actually, the EPA was focusing on very limited aspects of Koch Industries and not the company as a whole. Further, Koch Industries has a history with the EPA that was completely glossed over, and it includes multiple violations of rules.
The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it Mostly False.
No comments:
Post a Comment