From: EcoWatch
by
As a writer of environmental issues, as well as a person concerned
about the future of the planet, I am anxiously awaiting the decision on
the Keystone XL
pipeline. I keep questioning if the U.S. is ready to set an example by
eliminating fossil fuel extraction. Will we get down to the hard work of
moving forward on a different energy path?
With all the recent news about oils spills and the 25th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez
disaster—you have to wonder about the advisability of 1,660 miles of
pipeline transversing the nation. It will be transporting 830,000
barrels of oil on a daily basis from the Canadian Alberta oil sands to
the refineries of the beleaguered city of Port Arthur (home to several
refineries, chemical plants and an incinerator). I have written about
the abysmal lack of environmental justice for the indigenous communities in Canada and the low-income urban victims in Port Arthur.
There are constantly new sidebars in the debate. One was about the contractor who
compiled the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and if there was a
conflict of interest stemming from a prior relationship with
TransCanada. Allegations aside, the EIS did make note of “elevated
levels of carcinogen and mercury” that would be emitted into the air and acknowledged the “difficulty” of cleaning up potential spills. MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment