From: AlterNet
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com |
May 12, 2013
|
It’s hard to imagine a more loathsome figure than the mob debt
collector, a.k.a the “hired muscle.” It was this bruiser’s job to get
the money owed to the Boss, by whatever methods he saw fit. That might
include coming to your house in the dead of night to break your
kneecaps. Whatever it took. The collector was promised a cut of that
money, and he was going to get it.
Gangsta-style big banks have taken up where this character left off.
They may not send a guy to break your kneecaps, but they are working in
the shadows, chasing down debts from credit cards using methods that are
both fraudulent and unlawful. They do this whether you actually owe the money or not.
Here’s the skinny: After widespread outrage over the big banks’ last
crime wave against the American consumer – the “robo-signing” scam in
which homeowners were hustled out of their houses by banks that sent
fraudulent paperwork through the courts, they are at it again. This
time, banksters are accused of helping debt collectors pursue faulty
judgments against credit card customers by various dirty tricks that
include – surprise! – robo-signing.
California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who filed suit against JPMorgan Chase last Thursday,
says that from January 2008 to April 2011 -- just as people were
reeling from the Wall Street-driven financial crisis -- the megabank
unleashed over 100,000 lawsuits against consumers over uncollected
credit-card debt in the state of California alone. That includes 469 lawsuits in a single day.
Now, it usually takes time and money to pursue lawsuits through the
court system. So how in the world did Chase keep up this breakneck pace?
The lawsuit claims that the bank took a number of little shortcuts,
like robo-signing, in which bank employees produce sworn documents and
other legal filings without bothering to check bank records or examine
cases for accuracy.
Another nasty trick Chase is accused of deploying is what’s known,
appropriately, as “sewer service.” This means that Chase failed to
properly serve notice of debt collection lawsuits against consumers (it
dumped the notices “in the sewer”), but then lied and said it did. This
means, you, as a consumer, have no idea that a lawsuit has been launched
against you. So here’s what happens: you get a default judgment that
automatically favors the debt collector. The credit card company can
then garnish your wages or freeze your bank account to get the money it
says you owe. And you might not even owe it! Banks are sometimes chasing
down consumers who have already paid their debts. Other times they are
jacking up the size of the debts by adding bogus fees and interest
costs.
All of this, of course, is unlawful. But it’s happening on a massive scale.
Last summer, a civil court judge in Brooklyn who presides over as many as 100 credit card cases a day told the New York Times
that a whopping 90 percent of the credit card lawsuits that came across
his desk were flawed and could not prove that a person owed the debt.
Here’s the kicker: The errors in credit card suits often go undetected
because the borrowers usually don’t show up in court to defend
themselves (how can they, if they don’t know the suit has been filed?).
As a result, an estimated 95 percent of lawsuits result in default judgments in favor of lenders.
The really chilling message sent in this new plot to squeeze cash out
of hard-pressed Americans is that the big banks are completely
undaunted by their exposure in the foreclosure robo-signing scam.
Whatever penalties or bad publicity they have received have not
restrained them one iota from pulling the exact same fraud again on
hapless consumers. Neither has the creation of the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, which now hangs in limbo with the endlessly delayed
confirmation of Richard Cordray as head. The CFPB knows what’s going on,
and it sent a friendly little note to Congress
saying that “we are concerned about the system-wide problems in the
debt collection market…and we want to see good practices come to
dominate the market, including improved data integrity.” Well, golly,
that’s reassuring.
No comments:
Post a Comment